Hiring a Whistleblower Attorney

Whistleblower Attorney

If you are considering hiring a whistleblower attorney to represent you in a case, read on for some important facts. We’ll cover the laws that protect whistleblowers, experience of whistleblower attorneys, and compensation. Finally, we’ll discuss retaliation. In this article, we’ll discuss some of the common questions whistleblower attorneys get. This article was written for individuals like you, who have come forward and bravely come forward to report wrongdoing.

Laws governing whistleblowers

Whistleblower attorneys can take cases involving the misuse of public funds, including the False Claims Act. Under the False Claims Act, individuals can sue the government for any financial benefit that comes as a result of their reporting of misconduct. In addition, these claims can also be brought against conspiracies that attempt to violate the law. Attorneys who specialize in whistleblower cases are entitled to fifteen to thirty percent of the total recoveries.

The laws governing whistleblowers are meant to protect these Whistleblower Attorney  individuals who come forward to report illegal activities. Whistleblowers should be rewarded for their efforts, but it is important to consult a lawyer first. Although reporting internal wrongdoing may not be protected conduct, whistleblowers are able to help the government recover billions of dollars. In fact, one whistleblower who reported the illegal activities at the UBS bank was awarded $104 million. The awards for this kind of reporting are meant to encourage people to continue to do the right thing.

Experience of whistleblower attorneys

It is essential to hire a whistleblower attorney with extensive experience with the False Claims Act. Experienced attorneys are better able to assess your case and determine whether it is worth filing. They can also assist you in assembling evidence and maximizing your chances of success. When choosing an attorney, make sure you select someone with a proven track record of success. This article looks at the advantages and disadvantages of hiring a whistleblower attorney with experience.

When deciding whether to hire a whistleblower attorney, make sure they have a successful track record of success. A whistleblower must have compelling evidence in order to win their case. If the government can easily corroborate your testimony, it may well be able to win. However, remember that your protection is at stake. Whistleblowers should never be afraid of facing criminal charges, even if they’re rewarded with substantial monetary rewards. Experienced whistleblower attorneys are prepared to handle any situation.


The government is notoriously stingy when it comes to compensating whistleblower attorneys. But there are ways to maximize your reward while still protecting your identity. One way is to submit information to whistleblower programs. These programs pay a reward to a whistleblower for reporting fraud. The only catch is that the evidence must be original and not the subject of a news story or enforcement action. As a result, the longer you wait to report the fraud, the lower your chances of receiving the reward. A whistleblower will need tangible evidence to succeed in this case, such as documents, emails, meeting minutes, spreadsheets, and text messages. An attorney is invaluable to assist you in gathering this information.

Another option for whistleblowers is to file a qui tam lawsuit. This lawsuit is often filed on behalf of a government agency or individual. In this case, the whistleblower may have discovered fraud and the plaintiff can receive as much as 25% of the money recovered. Typically, whistleblowers are former or current employees of the company they’re suing. However, whistleblowers may be independent contractors or business associates.

Retaliation of whistleblowers

A good employment attorney will be able to identify the signs of retaliation and determine which behaviors may be grounds for a wrongful termination lawsuit. Depending on the nature of the retaliation, employers may try to disguise their intent by using “legitimate” reasons to fire a whistleblower. Ultimately, however, it will be up to the whistleblower to establish a direct connection between their reporting of wrongdoing and the adverse action.

While this is a highly complex area of law, there are a number of different kinds of evidence that can help establish retaliation of whistleblowers. Many employers overlook this type of evidence, such as a policy that requires three warnings before termination. Instead of giving an employee three warnings, they may fire them without providing adequate notice. A good piece of circumstantial evidence for a retaliatory action is proximity. If the retaliation of a whistleblower occurred close to where the employee worked, there is a higher chance that the action was intentional.